Roots Analysis has announced the addition of “Container Closure Integrity Testing Services Market, 2022-2035”, covering key aspects of the industry’s evolution and identifying potential future growth opportunities.
To order this 100+ slides report, which features 105+ figures and 2+ tables, please visit https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/container-closure-integrity-testing-services-market.html
Key Market Insights
§ Over 85% of the service providers are offering deterministic methods for testing container closure integrity testing; of these, more than 65% use headspace analysis and close to 60% use vacuum / pressure decay analysis
§ Within Europe, over 45% of the service providers are large players; of these, more than 85% players were established before 1990.
§ More than 55% of container closure integrity testing equipment employ vacuum / pressure decay technique. Further, over 15% of the equipment are equipped with more than four key features and can be used for clinical / commercial scale testing.
§ Significant share of demand for container closure integrity testing services is likely to be generated from vials; of this, around 80% of this demand is for testing vials made from glass. Further, around 70% of the demand for container closure integrity testing services is likely to be generated in North America and Asia-Pacific.
§ Currently, majority (~60%) of the service-based revenues is likely to come in from integrity testing of vials; this trend is unlikely to change in the foreseen future. Further, glass vials hold the major share (~80%) in container closure integrity testing services market.
For more information, please visit https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/container-closure-integrity-testing-services-market.html
Table of Contents
1. PREFACE
1.1. Overview
1.2. Scope of the Report
1.3. Research Methodology
1.4. Key Questions Answered
1.5. Chapter Outlines
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3. INTRODUCTION
3.1. Chapter Overview
3.2. Primary Packaging: Container Closure Systems
3.3. Types of Container Closure Systems
3.4. Problems Related to Container Closure Systems
3.4.1. Types of Contamination
3.4.2. Defects in Container Closure Systems
3.5. Container Closure Integrity testing (CCI Testing)
3.6. Methods of Container Closure Integrity Testing
3.7. Advantages of Container Closure Integrity Testing Over Sterility Testing
3.8. Role of CCIT Service Providers
3.9. Future Perspective
Press Release: Variation 2 (Format 3)
4. MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1. Chapter Overview
4.2. Container Closure Integrity Testing Service Providers: Market Landscape
4.2.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
4.2.2. Analysis by Company Size
4.2.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
4.2.4. Analysis by Company Size and Location of Headquarters
4.2.5. Analysis by Location of Analytical Facilities
4.2.6. Analysis by Type(s) of Analytical Method(s) Offered
4.2.6.1. Analysis by Type(s) of Probabilistic Method(s) Offered
4.2.6.2. Analysis by Type(s) of Deterministic Method(s) Offered
4.2.7. Analysis by Leakage Susceptibility
4.2.8. Analysis by Type(s) of Container(s) Tested
4.2.9. Analysis by Type(s) of Container Material(s) Tested
4.2.10. Analysis by Accreditation(s) Received
5. COMPANY COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS
5.1. Chapter Overview
5.2. Methodology
5.3. Key Parameters
5.4. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in North America
5.5. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in Europe and Asia-Pacific
5.6. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in One Analytical Facility
5.7. Competitiveness Analysis: Companies Offering Container Closure Integrity Testing Services in More than Analytical Facility
6. CONTAINER CLOSURE INTEGRITY TESTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN NORTH AMERICA: COMPANY PROFILES
6.1. Chapter Overview
6.2. Berkshire Sterile Manufacturing
6.2.1. Company Overview
6.2.2. Financial Information
6.2.3. Service Portfolio
6.2.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
6.3. Curia
6.3.1. Company Overview
6.3.2. Financial Information
6.3.3. Service Portfolio
6.3.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
6.4. DDL
6.4.1. Company Overview
6.4.2. Financial Information
6.4.3. Service Portfolio
6.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
6.5. Nelson Labs
6.5.1. Company Overview
6.5.2. Financial Information
6.5.3. Service Portfolio
6.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
Press Release: Variation 2 (Format 3)
7. CONTAINER CLOSURE INTEGRITY TESTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN EUROPE: COMPANY PROFILES
7.1. Chapter Overview
7.2. Confarma
7.2.1. Company Overview
7.2.2. Financial Information
7.2.3. Service Portfolio
7.2.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.3. Eurofins
7.3.1. Company Overview
7.3.2. Financial Information
7.3.3. Service Portfolio
7.3.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.4. SGS
7.4.1. Company Overview
7.4.2. Financial Information
7.4.3. Service Portfolio
7.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.5. Stevanato
7.5.1. Company Overview
7.5.2. Financial Information
7.5.3. Service Portfolio
7.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
7.6. Wilco
7.6.1. Company Overview
7.6.2. Financial Information
7.6.3. Service Portfolio
7.6.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
8. CASE STUDY: MARKET LANDSCAPE OF CONTAINER CLOSURE INTEGRITY TESTING EQUIPMENT PROVIDERS
8.1. Chapter Overview
8.2. Container Closure Integrity Testing Equipment: Market Landscape
8.2.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation
8.2.2. Analysis by Key Features
8.2.3. Analysis by Type(s) of Analytical Method(s) Offered
8.2.4. Analysis by Type(s) of Container Material(s) Tested
8.2.5. Analysis by Type(s) of Container(s) Tested
8.3. Container Closure Integrity Testing Equipment Providers: Developer Landscape
8.3.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
8.3.2. Analysis by Company Size
8.3.3. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
8.3.4. Analysis by Company Size and Location of Headquarters
8.3.5. Leading Developers: Analysis by Number of Products
9. PRODUCT COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS
9.1. Chapter Overview
9.2. Methodology
9.3. Assumptions / Key Parameters
9.4. Product Competitiveness Analysis: Container Closure Integrity Testing Equipment Offered by Small Players
Press Release: Variation 2 (Format 3)
9.5. Product Competitiveness Analysis: Container Closure Integrity
